.
Feedback

Conversations With Health: Buying Organic, A Manifesto

Buying organic is worth the difference in cost, since in doing so we support an entire range of practices that benefit not only our bodies but the long-term health of the planet.

by Christopher Hassett

I’m continually hearing from family and friends that I should only be buying organic.  For the difference in price, is organic really that much better?  --Mitchell

Buying organic is worth the difference in cost, since in doing so we support an entire range of practices that benefit not only our bodies but the long-term health of the planet.  We are living in a time when the global agribusiness is consuming and destroying every aspect of our environment, from our soils to ground wells to rivers and gulf-waters, our few remaining woodlands, to the very air we breathe.  The immediate consequence is that we ourselves, our bodies and minds, are similarly being compromised: our body tissue, blood and respiratory system, all of which have correlatives in the soil, water and air of our earth, are now in a general state of imbalance and decline, and this has everything to do with the mounting impacts of industrial farming.  

When the environment we move through begins to fail we should absolutely be concerned, and things are indeed failing all around us.  Consider, for instance, the massive dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, an area as large as 7000 square miles, which is annually killed off by agricultural pollutants washed out from the Mississippi River, itself now wholly poisoned by a slurry of pesticides, fertilizers, animal wastes and an enormous yearly run-off of toxic soils from commercial farms the river high.  And this one dead zone replicates numerous others around the world, all rendered lifeless by an corporate agri-complex that profits handsomely in the ruin.  

Consider as well the produce in our markets that is now as contaminated with pesticides as the groundwater used to cultivate it.  Consider farmers who breathe in these pesticides, pesticides they are forced to buy lest they be promptly muscled out of the business, only to die at alarmingly high rates from respiratory disease, organ failure and cancer.  Consider the animals on these industrial farms who we in turn eat as chicken breast or filet or pork loin or pâté -- these animals are routinely shovel-fed their own waste along with the minced bodies of other animals who commonly drop mid-step from organ failure or disease or from the sheer exhaustion of a lifetime of  abuse and fear.  

These same animals are pumped regularly with arsenic (yes, arsenic!) and antibiotics to help cut down on parasites and infections (with the bonus from arsenic of adding an appetizing color to the flesh) and growth hormones that work so incredibly well that legs tend to snap under the freakish weight of their synthetically swollen bodies.  The solution for this trifle annoyance?  Chop off the legs and let the beast languish in its own excrement until, no hurry, it’s ready for slaughter.  And there is no better word, for they are indeed slaughtered in ways that would, were they human, be considered crimes against humanity; in other words, their deaths are unimaginably more inhumane than was their entire existence on “The Farm.”  

Yet all of this is supported in the marketplace by our dollar, which in turn is supported by our unique expectation, culturally speaking, for cheap produce, dairy and meat.  No other country has such unrealistic expectations, but then no other country has so contentedly given over its power, principles and pristine lands as we have in the last half century, all for the luxury of having low cost eggs and two dollar burgers.

There are alternatives to this mad-cow system, and buying organic is an excellent first choice.  Despite the regulating fiasco for conventional farming, organic practices are fairly well monitored in the US.  Animals raised under organic guidelines cannot be fed antibiotics or growth hormones, nor can their DNA be genetically re-engineered to produce more desirable, i.e. profitable, traits; excrement and dead bodies cannot be mixed in with the feed; access to the outdoors must be allowed for all animals, including access to pasture-land for grazing.  A mere few decades ago this was considered normal practice; today it is called enlightened farming, and it is one we should support.

Produce grown organically cannot be chemically fertilized, cannot be genetically modified, cannot be irradiated for longer shelf life.  Raw sewage can’t be pumped onto the soil.  Needless to say, food grown organically tastes better and is substantially more nutritious than conventionally grown crops.  It is higher in vitamins, minerals, and higher even in actual weight.  Perhaps the cost difference in your question is perfectly addressed here, for when dried, organically grown crops weigh as much as 95% more than their conventional counterparts, which means more actual food content.  So if you’re spending 50% more on an organic apple and getting 95% more apple, then the differences in cost will often even out.

But if the dollar remains your fixed bottom line, and I understand how this is the reality for many of us today, then not everything you buy need be organic.  For purely ethical reasons I still strongly encourage all animal products be purchased organic, no matter the difference in cost.  Go a step further and look for labels that say “pasture raised” or “grass fed,” since these more specific labels lets us know that the animal has indeed spent a good portion of its life in a more spacious outdoors.  Some health food stores now help us in making better choices by rating how well an animal has lived, how well it’s been cared for during its time on the farm, which beyond the euphemism is time spent in preparation for our plates.  

Consider that one idea alone when weighing the price of your meal: this animal you are buying for dinner lived its entire life for that single purpose, for that moment when you will cook it and eat it.  So is the life of that chicken worth eight dollars or twelve?  Eight dollars equates to a life of cruelty and absolute misery; twelve to some standard far better.  Your four dollars changes everything, including the energetic value of what you will be putting into your body.

With produce, however, you can shop more thriftily and traditionally while still being aware of what tends to be harmful on the conventional shelves.  A conventional apple, for instance, is laced with 40 different pesticides, many of which cannot be washed off.  You will eat those pesticides, absorb them, and years later there will be a greater potential for things to go amiss.  Celery, strawberries and peaches sit in our stores like art in their perfection, yet on their skins await 60 different pesticides ready for our consumption.  Spinach has 50.  These five top the dozen or so foods (all listed online) that you should definitely avoid when selecting conventional.  Buy them organic without any hesitation.  Avocados, on the other hand, along with lemons, oranges, watermelons, onions, garlic, and anything else that peels away to a protected inner flesh, these you really don’t need to buy organic if money is of concern.  

It’s time for us all to take a stand against the noxious practices of industrial farming, not only to protect our own vulnerable bodies, which are notably larger and sicker than ever before in history, but to also to protect the irreplaceable resources of this earth, which each day vanish before our very eyes.

Christopher Hassett is a life coach and teacher of self awareness.  You can reach him through his website at www.threeperfections.com.  Do you have a question you’d like Christopher to respond to in his column?  Email him at conversations@threeperfections.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Laguna Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Happening this Sunday at Laguna Beach United Methodist Church ...
Announcements  

0   Recommend Rich Kane (Editor)

Happening this Sunday at Laguna Beach United Methodist Church ...
Patrick Fetzer May 16, 2013 at 01:21 pm
I don't think it was a mistake. The City is leading by example. Keeping sidewalks clean andRead More unbroken from roots....there are LOTS of trees around. Its not there aren't. Besides, who's to say they won't later plant Olive trees or something that won't jack up the sidewalks and take away views!
Stan Jacobs May 16, 2013 at 11:52 am
Laguna changed for the worst when residents who loved Laguna were, over time, displaced by those whoRead More love themselves.
Joanne Sutch May 15, 2013 at 02:11 pm
There is certainly a case, Rich, for buckling sidewalks and safety (which is what City CouncilRead More claimed...along with a $300,000. payout for slip and falls over the past 5 years.) That being said, there are other far less drastic measures that could (and should have been taken years ago). The ficus trees in front of the old persian rug store were not a mistake, they were a request by the new tenants who are trying to "historically" recreate the old building. I'd like to know what trees were "historically" there. They certainly were not New Zealand Christmas trees ( the City's planned on replacement tree.) I object to the City selecting the trees, as there seems to be a "patchwork quilt" effect that is happening. Just like the main entrance to Laguna, we need a new, well thought-out, hammered out tree plan. We also need the City to fund and maintain our trees, which has been sorely lacking (due to budget and lack of any importance being placed on them). I wonder what else we're going to find out re: what other payouts we've been making for other things. (For instance, how much have we paid out for people being hit in the crosswalks? I'll bet that it's a lot more than $300k in 5 years. If not, I'd be pleasantly surprised. ) Perhaps our City officials should be more up front with us about this kind of information, as well as about budget matters. That transparency seems to be missing in the last year or two. If I'm not mistaken, the $ in our capital budget for improving and repair/replacing some of the street end banisters is being re-routed for the beginning funding of the parking garage on Broadway and Forest. Know that more trees are in peril, so, in addition to blogging, everyone please take a moment to express your concerns to each of our council members and our city manager via e-mail or personally. They don't even seem to think that these tree removals deserve to be on the City Council Meeting Agendas (or at least not until the 12th hour). Thanks.
ms.sc. May 14, 2013 at 05:06 am
Wow! There are some hungry, imaginative "sales people" out there! And the ego's behindRead More their "gypsy wagon beliefs" is costly to fools who part with their bank accounts only because of their grief of a loved one has not progressed thru the stages of grief. I wonder what "tonic" is next out of a "psychic's" circus tent? Sick.
El Toro Resident May 14, 2013 at 12:49 am
Thanks Louie, I was just having fun with you.
Louie Wilson May 12, 2013 at 08:01 pm
You guys are a riot. You seem to want to debate me on the subject matter when all I did was complainRead More that the article that Rich wrote is badly written. We're not discussing mediumship; we're discussing bad journalism. Rich doesn't seem to understand why I think what he wrote is unfair. I guess it's his prejudice against the subjects that is blinding him. If an Orange County surgeon left a scalpel in a patient's body, would he write an article about that surgeon and start off by saying: "Well, it's been a bad week for surgeons."?
elizabeth May 10, 2013 at 08:39 am
Ya apasado un mes de la muerte de mi padrastro alberto casique solo espero q la persona q causo suRead More muerte page el abernos quitado a un hombre tan trabajador y respetuoso y alegre estrano mucho llegar y que mediga "todo bien" descansa en paz Alberto.
Eric Garcia April 13, 2013 at 04:59 pm
Hi diana lynn im juniors brother and told me he couldnt log in into the account anymore his numberRead More is 7147243020 thank you
Diana Lynn April 12, 2013 at 02:17 am
Dear Junior, I'm so sorry for your loss. It seems that Armando was a really wonderful person.Read More Everything I've read about him is just awesome. If you are comfortable with contacting me, I know someone that has some information about this tragedy and would like to share what they can with you and his family. Again, I'm so sorry for the loss to your family.
Joanne Sutch April 14, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Everyone, please e-mail all of our council members and city manager with your opinions. Things getRead More changed when their e-mail is flooded. Then, show up at the next City Council and voice your concerns. While your at it, take a look at the downtown plan that is being implemented as we speak, and the trees we'll be losing. There must be a better way!
Joanne Sutch April 13, 2013 at 10:45 pm
It's heartening to hear so many concerned and fiscally responsible Lagunans. I, too, am concernedRead More and would like more time and information before agreeing to dig. Did you know that Councilwoman Iseman has an alternate plan, using the tennis courts as part of the parking. Instead of a 29' parking structure hers would be an 18'foot structure, with additional parking across PCh at the tennis courts. I want to hear more about her plan before committing $38 million+ to this project. As we speak, the 10-year capital plan is being revised to accomodate $5 million for the next 2 years for this project. I would like to know what is being wait-listed for this project. Who suddenly deemed this Laguna's #1 concern? I urge everyone to immediately: 1) go to the next City Council meeting and voice your concerns and 2) e-mail each and every council member and our city manager. Be heard. No offense, but I want more than our Council and City Manager determining such life-changing moves in Laguna. Remember-they are constrained by governmental constrictions (eg: the low-bidder on projects). We have a superior community and deserve top notch planners, builders, etc. As for the people in town, I totally commiserate. However, know that the next 3-5 years will be an absolute nightmare with this work. One of our biggest parking problems nowadays is construction vehicles and also construction workers own private vehicle parking.
Laguna Streets April 9, 2013 at 01:50 am
Mark: There are dozens of alternatives to the automobile, you can find some of them posted atRead More LagunaStreets. There are even more outside the bubble of Laguna, municipalities are adopting alternative mobility plans all over the US and Europe. The resistance to alternative mobility comes from city hall, from community leaders who stubbornly refuse to consider new ideas and acknowledge success in other communities. They don't even listen to professional advice they paid for. I parked my car in the garage in 2006, have not driven it since. I live and work in Laguna and live on "top of the hill", I regularly reach any point in Laguna - most frequently by bicycle, often by scooter or bus. The health benefit from riding a bicycle around Laguna should be obvious.